3.8 Review

Glucose isomerase: insights into protein engineering for increased thermostability

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00246-6

Keywords

xylose (glucose) isomerase; catalytic mechanism; metal ion binding; subunit dissociation; protease nicking; conformational change; structural comparison; thermostability; thermoinactivation pathway; protein engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermostable glucose isomerases are desirable for production of 55% fructose syrups at > 90 degreesC. Current commercial enzymes operate only at 60 degreesC to produce 45% fructose syrups. Protein engineering to construct more stable enzymes has so far been relatively unsuccessful, so this review focuses on elucidation of the thermal inactivation pathway as a future guide. The primary and tertiary structures of 11 Class 1 and 20 Class 2 enzymes are compared. Within each class the structures are almost identical and sequence differences are few. Structural differences between Class 1 and Class 2 are less than previously surmised. The thermostabilities of Class 1 enzymes are essentially identical, in contrast to previous reports, but in Class 2 they vary widely. In each class, thermal inactivation proceeds via the tetrameric apoenzyme, so metal ion affinity dominates thermostability. In Class 1 enzymes, subunit dissociation is not involved, but there is an irreversible conformational change in the apoenzyme leading to a more thermostable inactive tetramer. This may be linked to reversible conformational changes in the apoenzyme at alkaline pH arising from electrostatic repulsions in the active site, which break a buried Arg-30-Asp-299 salt bridge and bring Arg-30 to the surface. There is a different salt bridge in Class 2 enzymes, which might explain their varying thermostability. Previous protein engineering results are reviewed in light of these insights. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available