4.5 Article

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated synaptic potentials in rat neocortex

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 887, Issue 2, Pages 399-405

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03076-6

Keywords

EPSP; nicotine; acetylcholine; rat; neocortex; electrophysiology

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS18145, NS22373] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the neocortex, fast excitatory synaptic transmission can typically be blocked by using excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptor antagonists. In recordings from layer II/III neocortical pyramidal neurons, we observed an evoked excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) or current (EPSC) in the presence of EAA receptor antagonists (40-100 muM D-APV+20 muM CNQX, or 5 mM kynurenic acid) plus the GABA(A)-receptor antagonist bicuculline (BIC, 20 muM). This EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC was observed in about 70% of neurons tested, it had a duration of approximately 20 ms and an amplitude of 61.5+/-6.8 pA at -70 mV (n=35). The EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC current-voltage relation was linear and reversed near 0 mV (n=23). The nonselective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists dihydro-beta -erythroidine (DH betaE, 100 muM) or mecamylamine (50 muM) reduced EPSC amplitudes by 42 (n=20) and 33% (n=9), respectively. EPSC kinetics were not significantly changed by either antagonist. Bath application of 10 muM neostigmine, a potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, prolonged the EPSC decay time. EAA-antagonist resistant EPSCs were observed in the presence of antagonists of metabotropic glutamate, serotonergic (5-HT3) and purinergic (P2) receptors. The EAA-antagonist resistant EPSC appears to be due in part to activation of postsynaptic nAChRs. These results suggest the existence of functional synaptic nAChRs on pyramidal neurons in rat neocortex. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available