4.7 Article

Protective role of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the adverse action of passive cigarette smoking on the initiation of experimental colitis in rats

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 411, Issue 1-2, Pages 193-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00914-6

Keywords

cigarette smoke; inflammatory bowel disease; cyclooxygenase-2; 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid; cyclooxygenase inhibitor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical and experimental findings had indicated that cigarette smoke exposure, and cyclooxygenase-2, are strongly associated with inflammatory bowel disease. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of cyclooxygenase-2 in the pathogenesis of experimental inflammatory bowel disease as well as in the adverse action of cigarette-smoke exposure. Rats were pretreated with different cyclooxygenase-3 inhibitors (indomethacin, nimesulide. or SC-236 (4-[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]benzenesulfonamide)) along with cigarette-smoke exposure before 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-enema. Results indicated that pretreatment with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors not only protected against 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced inflammatory bowel disease, but also attenuated the potentiating effect of cigarette-smoke exposure on colonic damage. Furthermore, the colonic cyclooxygenase protein and mRNA expression was markedly induced by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenssulfonic acid-enema, and it was potentiated further by cigarette-smoke exposure, while the cyclooxygenase-1 expression was not changed. The present study suggests that the highly induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression not only plays a pathogenic role in 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenrsulfonic acid-induced inflammatory bowel disease, but also contributes to the adverse action of cigarette-smoke exposure on this disorder. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available