4.7 Article

Polyethylene glycol-coated red blood cells fail to bind glycophorin A -: Specific antibodies and are impervious to invasion by the Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 551-556

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V97.2.551

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL15722, HL48484] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to assess the binding of glycophorin A-specific antibodies to polyethylene glycol (PEG)modified red blood cells (RBCs) and evaluate their resistance to invasion by Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites. RBCs were conjugated with a range of concentrations (0.05 to 7.5 mM) of activated PEG derivatives of either 3.35 or 18.5 kd molecular mass. The binding of glycophorin A-specific antibodies was assessed by hemagglutination and flow cytometry, PEG-modified RBCs were assessed for their ability to form rosettes around Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transiently expressing the glycophorin A binding domain of EBA-175, a P falciparum ligand crucial to RBC invasion. PEG-RBCs were also tested for their ability to be invaded by the malaria parasite. RBCs coated with 3.35 and 18.5 kd PEG demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of glycophorin A-specific antibody binding, CHO cell resetting, and P falciparum invasion. These results indicate that glycophorin A epitopes responsible for antibody and parasite binding are concealed by PEG coating, rendering these cells resistant to P falciparum invasion. These studies confirm the effectiveness of PEG modification for masking RBC-surface glycoproteins. This may provide a means to prevent alloimmunization in the setting of RBC transfusion and suggests a novel method to enhance the effectiveness of exchange transfusion for the treatment of cerebral malaria. (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available