4.5 Article

Spectroscopic and DFT studies on 6-Aminophenanthridine and its derivatives provide insights in their activity towards ribosomal RNA

Journal

BIOCHIMIE
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 194-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.10.012

Keywords

6AP; PFAR; Fluorescence; DFT; Ribosomal RNA

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Carl Tiyggers Stiftelse
  3. VR-SIDA (Swedish Research Links)
  4. Linnaeus grant (Uppsala RNA Research Center)
  5. Wenner Gren Stiftelse
  6. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Ribo-CORE)
  7. SSF-Dalen program (Sweden-France bilateral collaboration)
  8. Chinese Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

6-Aminophenanthridine (6AP), a plant alkaloid possessing antiprion activity, inhibits ribosomal RNA dependent protein folding activity of the ribosome (referred as PFAR). We have compared 6AP and its three derivatives 6AP8CI, 6AP8CF(3) and 6APi for their activity in inhibition of PFAR. Since PFAR inhibition requires 6AP and its derivatives to bind to the ribosomal RNA (rRNA), we have measured the binding affinity of these molecules to domain V of 23S rRNA using fluorescence spectroscopy. Our results show that similar to the antiprion activity, both the inhibition of PFAR and the affinity towards rRNA follow the order 6AP8CF(3) > 6AP8Cl > 6AP, while 6APi is totally inactive. To have a molecular insight for the difference in activity despite similarities in structure, we have calculated the nucleus independent chemical shift using first principles density functional theory. The result suggests that the deviation of planarity in 6APi and steric hindrance from its bulky side chain are the probable reasons which prevent it from interacting with rRNA. Finally, we suggest a probable mode of action of 6AP, 6AP8CF(3) and 6AP8Cl towards rRNA. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available