4.8 Article

Stimulation of human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by AP-endonuclease: potential coordination of the initial steps in base excision repair

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 430-438

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.2.430

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA81063, R01 CA081063] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG10514] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES08457, R01 ES008457] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

8-Oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1), with intrinsic AP lyase activity, is the major enzyme for repairing 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a critical mutagenic DNA lesion induced by reactive oxygen species. Human OGG1 excised the damaged base from an 8-oxoG C-containing duplex oligo with a very low apparent k(cat) of 0.1 min(-1) at 37 degreesC and cleaved abasic (AP) sites at half the rate, thus leaving abasic sites as the major product. Excision of 8-oxoG by OGG1 alone did not follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics, However, in the presence of a comparable amount of human AP endonuclease (APE1) the specific activity of OGG1 was increased similar to5-fold and Michaelis-Menten kinetics were observed. Inactive APE1, at a higher molar ratio, and a bacterial APE (Nfo) similarly enhanced OGG1 activity. The affinity of OGG1 for its product AP.C pair (K-d similar to 2.8 nM) was substantially higher than for its substrate 8-oxoG.C pair (K-d similar to 23.4 nM) and the affinity for its final beta -elimination product was much lower (K-d similar to 233 nM), These data, as well as single burst kinetics studies, indicate that the enzyme remains tightly bound to its AP product following base excision and that APE1 prevents its reassociation with its product, thus enhancing OGG1 turnover. These results suggest coordinated functions of OGG1 and APE1, and possibly other enzymes, in the DNA base excision repair pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available