4.7 Article

Biomass production and allocation, including fine-root turnover, and annual N uptake in lysimeter-grown basket willows

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 140, Issue 2-3, Pages 177-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00319-4

Keywords

root dynamics; minirhizotron; carbon allocation; fertilization; Salix viminalis; short-rotation forest plantation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Annual net primary production (NPP) and N uptake were estimated for lysimeter-grown basket willows (Salix viminalis L.) during 3 years after planting. The willows were grown in a stand structure and continuously supplied with water and liquid fertilizer through drip tubes. The lysimeters contained either clay from the site or washed quartz sand. Shoot growth and leaf litter were measured and fine-root dynamics observed in minirhizotrons. Destructive samples were taken annually in late autumn and entire root systems were washed out. Dry mass and N content of all plant parts were determined. Fine-root production was estimated by two methods, based on destructive samplings and observations in minirhizotrons. The proportion of biomass allocated below ground increased considerably when estimates based on accumulated NPP were compared with those based on standing dry mass. In the first year, 49 and 58% of annual NPP in willows grown in clay and sand, respectively, was belowground. In subsequent years the proportions were 36-38% and 33-40%. Most belowground production was fine roots. Relatively more N was used belowground in the first year than subsequently, but no substrate-induced differences were observed in the allocation pattern. Both annual NPP and N uptake was always higher in plants in clay than in those in sand: in the final 2 years, 21-22 tonnes DM ha(-1) year(-1) and 190 kg N ha(-1) year(-1) in clay, and 9-10 tonnes DM ha(-1) year(-1) and 100 kg N ha(-1) year(-1) in sand. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available