4.7 Article

Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 305-313

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.305

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [(P30) CA-46592] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: A pilot study of 43 patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma treated with an intensive regimen of preoperative chemoradiation with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and vinblastine before surgery showed a median survival of 29 months in comparison with the la-month median survival of 100 historical controls treated with surgery alone at the same institution. We designed a randomized trial to compare survival for patients treated with this preoperative chemoradiation regimen versus surgery alone. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients with esophageal carcinoma were randomized to receive either surgery alone (arm I) or preoperative chemoradiation (arm II) with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 through 5 and 17 through 21, fluorouracil 300 mg/ m(2)/d on days 1 through 21, and vinblastine 1 mg/ m(2)/d on days 1 through 4 and 17 through 20. Radiotherapy consisted of 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily, Monday through Friday over 21 days, to a total dose of 45 Gy. Transhiatal esophagectomy with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was performed on approximately day 42. Results: At median follow-vp of 8.2 years, there is no significant difference in survival between the treatment arms. Median survival is 17.6 months in arm I and 16.9 months in arm II. Survival at 3 years was 16% in arm I and 30% in arm II (P =.15), This study was statistically powered to detect a relatively large increase in median survival from 1 year to 2.2 years, with at least 80% power. Conclusion: This randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone for patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma did not demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference. J Clin Oncol 19:305-313. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available