4.8 Article

Dendritic organization of actin comet tails

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 130-135

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00022-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI36929, R37 AI036929] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 25062] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymerization of actin filaments is necessary for both protrusion of the leading edge of crawling cells and propulsion of certain intracellular pathogens [1], and it is sufficient for generating force for bacterial motility in vitro [2]. Motile intracellular pathogens are associated with actin-rich comet tails containing many of the same molecular components present in lamellipodia [3], and this suggests that these two systems use a similar mechanism for motility. However, available structural evidence suggests that the organization of comet tails differs from that of lamellipodia. Actin filaments in lamellipodia form branched arrays [4], which are thought to arise by dendritic nucleation mediated by the Arp2/3 complex [5, 6]. In contrast, comet tails have been variously described as consisting of short, randomly oriented filaments [7], with a higher degree of alignment at the periphery [8], or as containing long, straight axial filaments with a small number of oblique filaments [9]. Because the assembly of pathogen-associated comet tails has been used as a model system for lamellipodial protrusion, it is important to resolve this apparent discrepancy. Here, using a platinum replica approach, we show that actin filament arrays in comet tails in fact have a dendritic organization with the Arp2/3 complex localizing to Y-junctions as in lamellipodia [10]. Thus, comet tails and lamellipodia appear to share a common dendritic nucleation mechanism for protrusive motility. However, comet tails differ from lamellipodia in that their actin filaments are usually twisted and appear to be under significant torsional stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available