4.8 Article

Mechanism of the selective reduction of NOX over Co/MFI:: Comparison with Fe/MFI

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 281-291

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.2000.3097

Keywords

NOx reduction with hydrocarbons; Co/MFI or Co/ZSM-5 catalysts for NOx reduction; Fe/MFI or Fe/ZSM-5 catalysts for NOx reduction; O-2 adsorption as superoxide ion; metal/zeolite preparation by sublimation; mechanism of NOx reduction over zeolite-based catalysts; cobalt oxo ions; reduction of Fe3+/Fe2+ versus Co2+/Co-0 redox couples in zeolites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co/MFI and Fe/MFI have been compared in catalytic tests of NOx reduction with isobutane and methane. FTIR, TPD-MS, and MS data of catalytic results with labeled molecules reveal a similar multistep mechanism over both catalysts for reduction with isobutane, but NOx reduction with methane over Co/MFI is qualitatively different. Reactive NOy (nitro and nitrate) groups are assumed to be formed from NO and an adsorbed superoxide ion, which was identified by its EPR signal at 77 K. Formation of nitrate ions and NO2 ligands is easily explained with this model. With isobutane as the reductant, Fe/MFI is more active, but Co/MFI is more selective, leading to 100% N-2 yield. The primary intermediate is a deposit, exposing nitrile and isocyanate groups; the latter react with NOx to form N-2 with one N atom from the deposit and the other from NO. An important difference between Co/MFI and Fe/MFI is the formation of zerovalent metal clusters in the former case and its absence in the latter. Clusters of Co-n(0), have been detected by EPR in catalysts with high Co loading after reduction at 300 degreesC. They catalyze the H/D exchange of CH4 with D-2. The possibility is discussed that under certain conditions such clusters could contribute to the activation of methane. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available