4.6 Article

In vitro binding of ribosomes to the β subunit of the Sec61p protein translocation complex

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 276, Issue 4, Pages 2340-2346

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M004867200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sec61p complex forms the core element of the protein translocation complex (translocon) in the rough endoplasmic reticulum trough ER) membrane. Translating or nontranslating ribosomes bind with high affinity to ER membranes that have been stripped of ribosomes or to liposomes containing purified Sec61p, Here we present evidence that the beta subunit of the complex (Sec61 beta) makes contact with nontranslating ribosomes, A fusion protein containing the Sec61 beta cytoplasmic domain (Sec61 beta (c)) prevents the binding of ribosomes to stripped ER-derived membranes and also binds to ribosomes directly with an affinity close to the affinity of ribosomes for stripped ER-derived membranes. The ribosome binding activity of Sec61 beta (c), like that of native ER membranes, is sensitive to high salt concentrations and is not based on an unspecific charge-dependent interaction of the relatively basic Sec61 beta (c) domain with ribosomal RNA. Like stripped ER membranes, the Sec61 beta (c) sequence binds to large ribosomal subunits in preference over small subunits, Previous studies have shown that Sec61 beta is inessential for ribosome binding and protein translocation, but translocation is impaired by the absence of Sec61 beta (c) and it has been proposed that Sec61 beta assists in the insertion of nascent proteins into the translocation pore. Our results suggest a physical interaction of the ribosome itself with Sec61 beta; this may normally occur alongside interactions between the ribosome and other elements of Sec61p, or it may represent one stage in a temporal sequence of binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available