4.5 Article

Pseudouridylation of 23S rRNA helix 69 promotes peptide release by release factor RF2 but not by release factor RF1

Journal

BIOCHIMIE
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 834-844

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.12.018

Keywords

Ribosome; Helix 69; Pseudouridines; Release factors

Funding

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [ETF7884, ETF7509]
  2. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [SF0140031Bs09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudouridine PP] is a frequent base modification in the ribosomal RNA [rRNA] and may be involved in the modulation of the conformational flexibility of rRNA helix-loop structures during protein synthesis. Helix 69 of 23S rRNA contains pseudouridines at the positions 1911, 1915 and 1917 which are formed by the helix 69-specific synthase RluD. The growth defect caused by the lack of RluD can be rescued by mutations in class I release factor RF2, indicating a role for helix 69 pseudouridines in translation termination. We investigated the role of helix 69 pseudouridines in peptide release by release factors RF1 and RF2 in an in vitro system consisting of purified components of the Escherichia coli translation apparatus. Lack of all three pseudouridines in helix 69 compromised the activity of RF2 about 3-fold but did not significantly affect the activity of RF1. Reintroduction of pseudouridines into helix 69 by RluD-treatment restored the activity of RF2 in peptide release. A Psi-to-C substitution at the 1917 position caused an increase in the dissociation rate of RF1 and RF2 from the postrelease ribosome. Our results indicate that the presence of all three pseudouridines in helix 69 stimulates peptide release by RF2 but has little effect on the activity of RF1. The interactions around the pseudouridine at the 1917 position appear to be most critical for a proper interaction of helix 69 with release factors. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available