3.8 Article

Flow-cytometric analysis of erythrocytes and reticulocytes in congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia type II (CDA II): value in differential diagnosis with hereditary spherocytosis

Journal

CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 7-13

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.2001.00354.x

Keywords

anemia; reticulocytes; erythrocytes; erythrocyte indices; dyserythropoietic; congenital spherocytosis; hereditary

Categories

Funding

  1. Telethon [E.0645] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia type II (CDA II) is the most common congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia. CDA II is frequently misdiagnosed as Hereditary Spherocytosis (HS) due to the presence of mild chronic haemolytic anaemia with splenomegaly, increased osmotic fragility, and presence of microspherocytes. Accurate diagnosis of CDA II is important to prevent severe iron overload. Erythrocyte and reticulocyte indices were assessed in 10 patients from six families with CDA II, 18 patients from eight families with HS, and 50 normal controls. Characteristic increases in distribution width were present in CDA II for cell volume (RDW, anisocytosis) and in HS for cell haemoglobin concentration (HDW, anisochromia), resulting in an RDW/HDW ratio which was significantly greater in CDA than HS (P < 0.0002). A cut-off value for RDW/HDW of 5.34 resulted in 89% sensitivity and 70% specificity in distinguishing CDA II from HS. Distribution width for cell haemoglobin content of reticulocytes (CHDWr) was characteristically increased in CDA II, resulting in a CHDW/CHDWr ratio significantly lower in CDA II than HS (P < 0.0002). A cut-off value of 0.98 provided 89% sensitivity and 80% specificity in distinguishing CDA II from HS. These differences in distribution widths of flow-cytometric parameters of reticulocytes and mature erythrocytes reflect the different pathogeneses of the two diseases and are helpful for the differential diagnosis of these two conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available