4.8 Article

The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics, and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages 935-942

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT PHYSIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.125.2.935

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas exchange parameters and stomatal physical properties were measured in Tradescantia virginiana plants grown under well-watered conditions and treated daily with either distilled water (control) or 3.0 mM abscisic acid (ABA). Photosynthetic capacity (CO2 assimilation rate for any given leaf intercellular CO2 concentration [C-i]) and relative stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapor-pressure difference were unaffected by the ABA treatment. However, at an ambient CO2 concentration (c(a)) of 350 mu mol mol(-1), ABA-treated plants operated with significantly lower c(i). ABA-treated plants had significantly smaller stomata and higher stomatal density in their lower epidermis. Stomatal aperture versus guard cell pressure (P-g) characteristics measured with a cell pressure probe showed that although the form of the relationship was similar in control and ABA-treated plants, stomata of ABA-treated plants exhibited more complete closure at P-g = 0 MPa and less than half the aperture of stomata in control plants at any given P-g. Scaling from stomatal aperture versus P-g to stomatal conductance versus P-g showed that plants grown under ABA treatment would have had significantly lower maximum stomatal conductance and would have operated with lower stomatal conductance for any given guard cell turgor. This is consistent with the observation of lower c(i)/c(a) in ABA-treated plants with a c(a) of 350 mu mol mol(-1). It is proposed that the ABA-induced changes in stomatal mechanics and stomatal conductance versus P-g efficiency that may be invoked under prolonged drought conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available