4.6 Review

Mucins and tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER
Volume 1846, Issue 1, Pages 142-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.008

Keywords

Mucin; Cancer; Resistance; Chemotherapeutic drug; Apoptosis; Prognosis biomarker

Funding

  1. SIRIC ONCOLille, Grant INCa-DGOS-Inserm [6041]
  2. Contrat de Plan Etat Region CPER Cancer
  3. la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisee Ligue, IVS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial cancer patients not considered eligible for surgical resection frequently benefit from chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is the treatment of cancer with one or combination of cytotoxic or cytostatic drugs. Recent advances in chemotherapy allowed a great number of cancer patients to receive treatment with significant results. Unfortunately, resistance to chemotherapeutic drug treatment is a major challenge for clinicians in the majority of epithelial cancers because it is responsible for the inefficiency of therapies. Mucins belong to a heterogeneous group of large O-glycoproteins that can be either secreted or membrane-bound. Implications of mucins have been described in relation to cancer cell behavior and cell signaling pathways associated with epithelial tumorigenesis. Because of the frequent alteration of the pattern of mucin expression in cancers as well as their structural and functional characteristics, mucins are thought to also be involved in response to therapies. In this report, we review the roles of mucins in chemoresistance and the associated underlying molecular mechanisms (physical barrier, resistance to apoptosis, drug metabolism, cell stemness, epithelial-mesenchymal transition) and discuss the therapeutic tools/strategies and/or prognosis biomarkers for personalized chemotherapy that could be proposed from these studies. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available