Journal
PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC
Volume 113, Issue 780, Pages 173-187Publisher
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/318610
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We present a strategy to identify several thousand stars that are astrometrically stable at the microarcsecond level for use in the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM) astrometric grid. The requirements on the grid stars make this a rather challenging task. Taking a variety of considerations into account, we argue for K giants as the best type of stars for the grid, mainly because they can be located at much larger distances than any other type of star owing to their intrinsic brightness. We show that it is possible to identify suitable candidate grid K giants from existing astrometric catalogs. However, double stars have to be eliminated from these candidate grid samples, since they generally produce much larger astrometric jitter than tolerable for the grid. The most efficient way to achieve this is probably by means of a radial velocity survey. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, we repeatedly measured the radial velocities for a preselected sample of 86 nearby Hipparcos K giants with precisions of 5-8 m s(-1). The distribution of the intrinsic radial velocity variations for the bona fide single K giants shows a maximum around 20 m s(-1), which is small enough not to severely affect the identification of stellar companions around other K giants. We use the results of our observations as input parameters for Monte Carlo simulations on the possible design of a radial velocity survey of all grid stars. Our favored scenario would result in a grid which consists to 68% of true single stars and to 32% of double or multiple stars with periods mostly larger than 200 years, but only 3.6% of all grid stars would display astrometric jitter larger than 1 mu as. This contamination level is probably tolerable.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available