4.6 Review

Serum microRNAs as powerful cancer biomarkers

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER
Volume 1806, Issue 2, Pages 200-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.07.002

Keywords

MicroRNA; Serum; Biomarker; Exosome; Cancer

Funding

  1. ELAN-Fonds
  2. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) at the University Hospital of the University of Erlangen-Nurnberg
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR832JA 968/5]
  4. Hertha Low Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level by either degrading or blocking translation of messenger RNA targets. Recent expression profiling studies have revealed that miRNAs play important regulatory roles in a variety of cellular functions as well as in every cancer type studied so far. Lately, the discovery of miRNAs in the serum of cancer patients opened up the exciting prospective of using miRNAs as powerful and non-invasive cancer biomarkers. In this article, we review the current literature on serum miRNAs in different cancer types and the approaches used to detect and quantify these molecules. We then discuss the potential of miRNA biomarkers to improve disease diagnosis by distinguishing healthy from malignant tissues, identifying the tissue of origin in poorly differentiated tumors or tumors of unknown origin and distinguishing between different subtypes of the same tumor. We will also compare the advantages and disadvantages of potential serum miRNA biomarker molecules for cancer classification, estimation of prognosis and prediction of therapeutic efficacy. Finally, we will establish a set of criteria that these new molecules and clinical studies that use them must fulfill before they can be used as reliable tools in diagnostic and prognostic settings. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available