4.7 Article

Electromagnetic heating of breast tumors in interventional radiology:: In vitro and in vivo studies in human cadavers and mice

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue 2, Pages 570-575

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe19570

Keywords

animals; breast neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; breast neoplasms, therapy; neoplasms, experimental studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To assess relevant parameters for the minimally invasive elimination of breast tumors by using a selective application of magnetite and exposure of the breast to an alternating magnetic field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The specific absorption rate (SAR) of different magnetite samples was determined calorimetrically. Temperature elevations based on magnetite mass (7-112 mg) and magnetic field amplitude (1.2-6.5 kA/m; frequency, 400 kHz) were investigated by using human breast tissue. Parameter combinations (21 mg +/- 9 [SD], 242-second magnetic field exposure, 6.5-kA/m amplitude) were tested in 10 immunodeficient mice bearing human adenocarcinomas (MX-1 cells). Histologic sections of heated tumor tissue were analyzed. RESULTS: SAR data of different magnetite particle types ranged from 3 to 211 W/g. Temperature elevation (DeltaT) as a function of the magnetite mass increased linearly up to 28 mg; at higher masses, a saturation of DeltaT was observed at nearly 88 degreesC. The dependence of DeltaT on magnetic field amplitude (H) revealed a third-order power law: DeltaT = 0.26 degreesC/(kA/m)(3) . H-3, with r(2) = 0.95. A mean temperature of 71 degreesC +/- 8 was recorded in the tumor region at the end of magnetic field exposure of the mice. Typical macroscopic findings included tumor shrinkage after heating. Histologically nuclear degenerations were observed in heated malignant cells. CONCLUSION: Magnetic heating of breast tumors is a promising technique for future interventional radiologic treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available