4.6 Article

Guar gum reduces postprandial hypotension in older people

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 162-167

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49037.x

Keywords

postprandial hypotension; gastric emptying; small intestinal absorption; 3-OMG; older; blood glucose; guar gum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether slowing of gastric emptying and glucose absorption with guar gum would reduce the fall in blood pressure after an oral glucose load in older subjects. DESIGN: A randomized, experimental, cross-over study. SETTING: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Ten healthy subjects, age 67 to 78. MEASUREMENTS: Simultaneous measurements of gastric emptying, blood pressure, blood glucose, serum insulin, and oral glucose absorption (3-O-methyl-D-glucose [3-OMG]) on two occasions after ingestion of 300 mL water containing 50 g glucose and 30 mL lemon juice, 3 g 3-OMG labeled with Tc-99m-sulphur colloid; with or without 9 g guar gum. Blood pressure and gastric emptying were monitored for 180 minutes. RESULTS: The magnitude of the falls in systolic (P = .02), diastolic (P < .05), and mean arterial (P = .05) blood pressure were less, and gastric emptying slower (P < .05), after guar. Blood glucose, insulin, and 3-OMG concentrations were reduced (P < .001 for all) by guar. 3-OMG con centrations were inversely related to the intragastric retention of glucose (r = -0.72, P = .02) and blood pressure was inversely related to 3-OMG (r = -0.64, P < .05) after the drink without guar. The blood glucose concentration was related to 3-OMG (r > 0.64, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Guar gum reduces the magnitude of the fall in blood pressure after oral glucose. Slowing of gastric emptying and glucose absorption may represent a novel approach to the treatment of postprandial hypotension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available