4.6 Article

Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in the apolipoprotein E knockout mouse

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 154, Issue 2, Pages 399-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00515-3

Keywords

atherosclerosis; mouse; plaque rupture; animal model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque is the main underlying cause of coronary artery thrombotic occlusion and subsequent myocardial infarction, but research into the causes and treatment of plaque rupture is hampered by the lack of a suitable animal model, Although complex atherosclerotic plaques can be induced in a number of experimental animal systems, in none of these is plaque rupture an established feature. We have surveyed branch points in the carotid arteries and aortas of apolipoprotein E knockout mice fed a diet supplemented with 21% lard and 0.15% cholesterol for up to 14 months. Six male and five female mice were used. Four of the male mice and four of the female mice died, after 46 +/- 3 weeks of feeding (range 37-59 weeks). Lumenal thrombus associated with atherosclerotic plaque rupture was observed in three male and all four female mice. In six of these seven mice, an atherosclerotic plaque rupture was found where the brachiocephalic artery branches into the right common carotid and right subclavian arteries. The ruptures were characterised by fragmentation and loss of elastin in the fibrous caps of relatively small and lipid-rich plaques overlying large complex lesions, with intraplaque haemorrhage. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed loss of smooth muscle cells from ruptured caps. These data suggest that long-term fat-feeding of apolipoprotein E knockout mice is a useful and reproducible model of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, and that these ruptures occur predominantly in the brachiocephalic artery. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available