4.5 Article

Increase in tonsillar germinal centre B-1 cell numbers in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients and reduced susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 301-308

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01431.x

Keywords

IgA nephropathy; tonsillar focal infection; mucosal immunity; B-1 cell; apoptosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IgAN is a common form of primary glomerulonephritis and also a disease of tonsillar focal infection. The comprehensive mechanism underlying this disease remains to be defined. To better understand its pathogenesis, we investigated tonsillar CD5(+) B cells (B-1 cells) with respect to IgA synthesis. Germinal centre (GC) B cells were isolated from the tonsils of IgAN patients and the number of B-1 cells in the GC determined by flow cytometry. GC B-1 and B-2 (CD5(-) B) cells were purified by cell sorter, the cells were incubated with agonist anti-CD40 MoAb and the ability for antibody production by B-1 and B-2 cells determined by ELISPOT assay. GC B-1 cells and B-2 cells were incubated with agonist anti-Fas MoAb, and apoptosis in GC B-1 cells and B-2 cells was analysed by flow cytometry. Although B-1 cells do not usually take part in the GC reaction, an increase in B-1 cell numbers was observed in the GC of tonsils from IgAN patients. These B-1 cells were likely IgA1 antibody-producing cells, since the prominent IgA subclass in IgAN is generally considered to be IgA1. Although Fas-dependent apoptosis is essential for the elimination of activated B cells, these B-1 cells showed a reduced susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis. It is conceivable that activated B-1 cells may survive in the GC due to impaired apoptosis and thus produce abnormal antibodies. These findings suggest that the immune responses of B-1 cells in the tonsillar GC could thus have an impact on the pathogenesis of IgAN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available