4.3 Article

Deletion analysis of regions at the C-terminal part of cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase from Bacillus circulans T-3040

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.12.009

Keywords

Bacillus circulans; Cycloisomaltooligosaccharide; Cyclodextran; Cycloisomaltooligosaccharide; glucanotransferase; C-terminal region

Funding

  1. Okinawa Prefecture, Japan
  2. BRAIN, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase (CITase) belongs to glycoside hydrolase family 66. According to the sequence alignment of enzymes in the same family, we divided the structure of CITase into five regions from the N terminus to the C terminus: an N-terminal conserved region (Ser1-Gly403), an insertion region (R1; Tyr404-Tyr492), two conserved regions (R2; Glu493-Ser596 and R3; Gly597-Met700), and a C-terminal variable region (R4; Lys701-Ser934). CITase catalyzes the synthesis of cycloisomaltooligosaccharides (CIs) with 7-17 glucose units (CI-7 to CI-17) from dextran. In order to clarify the functions of these C-terminal regions (R1-R4), we constructed 15 deletion mutant enzymes. M123 Delta, (R4-deleted), M Delta 234 (R1-deleted), and M Delta 23 Delta (R1/R4-deleted) catalyzed CI synthesis, but other mutants were inactive. M123 Delta, M Delta 234, and M Delta 23 Delta increased their K-m values against dextran 40. The wild-type enzyme and M123 Delta produced CI-8 predominantly, but M Delta 234 and M Delta 23 Delta lost CI-8 production specificity. The k(cat) values of M Delta 234 and M Delta 23 Delta decreased, and these mutants showed narrowed temperature and pH stability ranges. Our deletion analysis suggests that (i) R2 and R3 are crucial for CITase to generate an active form; (ii) both R1 and R4 contribute to substrate binding; and (iii) R1 also contributes to preference of CI-8 production and enzyme stability. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available