4.7 Article

Prevention of aortic and cardiac fibrosis by spironolactone in old normotensive rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 662-667

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01129-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES Because the synthesis of aldosterone is mainly modulated by angiotensin II through type I receptor stimulation and because converting enzyme inhibition (CEI) does not modify aortic extracellular matrix in old normotensive rats, the aim of the present study was to determine whether inhibition of aldosterone formation was able to prevent aortic fibrosis in old Sprague-Dawley normotensive rats. BACKGROUND We have previously shown that long-term aldosterone antagonism prevents the age-related increase in aortic collagen accumulation in young spontaneously hypertensive rats, independent of blood pressure changes. In contrast, we reported that the positive effects of CEI in the prevention of aortic collagen accumulation were related to the inhibition of angiotensin II actions on angiotensin II type I receptors. METHODS For this purpose, we studied the histomorphometric and stiffness (echo-tracking technique) changes of an eight-week treatment with the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone Dy comparison with placebo. RESULTS At the end of treatment, spironolactone in conscious animals did nut change intra-arterial blood pressure, aortic and carotid wall thickness, and cardiac weight. Cardiac collagen density and, to a lesser extent, carotid collagen and elastin densities and contents were significantly decreased in association with an increase of carotid distensibility. CONCLUSIONS These results show that in old normotensive rats, spironolactone can markedly prevent cardiac and, to a lesser extent, arterial fibrosis and improve arterial. stiffness, despite a lack of hypotensive effect. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available