4.5 Article

Genotypic variation in response of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) to atmospheric CO2 enrichment

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 371-379

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s004420000521

Keywords

aspen; elevated CO2; genetic variation; Populus tremuloides; primary production

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enriched atmospheric CO2 alters the quantity and quality of plant production, but how such effects vary among plant genotypes is poorly known. We evaluated the independent and interactive effects of CO2 and nutrient availability on growth, allocation and phytochemistry of six aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) genotypes. One-year-old trees, propagated from root cuttings, were grown in CO2-controlled glasshouses for 64 days, then harvested. Foliage was analyzed for levels of water, nitrogen, stal ch, phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins. Of seven plant growth/allocation variables measured, four (biomass production, stem growth, relative growth rate and root:shoot ratio) exhibited marginally to highly significant CO2 x genotype interactions. CO2 enrichment stimulated growth of some genotypes more than others, and this interaction was itself influenced by soil nutrient availability. In addition, enriched CO2 increased the magnitude of the among-genotype variance for four of the growth/allocation variables. Of six foliar chemical constituents analyzed, CO2-mediated responses of two (the phenolic glycoside tremulacin and condensed tannins) varied among genotypes. Moreover, enriched CO2 increased the magnitude of among-genotype variance for four of the chemical variables. Given the importance of these growth and chemical characteristics to the biological fitness of aspen, this research suggests that projected atmospheric CO2 increases are likely to alter the genetic structures and evolutionary trajectories of aspen populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available