4.6 Article

Glucose hydrogenation over promoted Co-B amorphous alloy catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 207, Issue 1-2, Pages 129-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00662-1

Keywords

glucose; hydrogenation; Co-B amorphous alloy; Cr- and W-promoters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucose hydrogenation was carried out in a well-stirred, high-pressure batch reactor on the unpromoted and Cr- and W-promoted Co-B amorphous alloy catalysts in the form of ultrafine particles. These were prepared by chemical reduction of the metallic salt solution with borohydride in aqueous solution. The Co-B amorphous alloy exhibited higher activity than other Co-based crystalline catalysts, mainly owing to the structural modification and the electronic interaction between metallic Co and alloying B (electronic effect). Its activity was even higher than that of either the Ni-B amorphous alloy catalyst or the Raney Ni catalyst, possibly due to the stronger adsorption ability of Co for hydrogen compared to that of Ni. Suitable concentration of either Cr- or W-promoters could further enhance the hydrogenation activity of Co-B amorphous alloy, since these promoters when present in the low-valent state contacting with the Co active sites could act as Lewis adsorption sites for the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group, which was then polarized, and thus, more easily hydrogenated via a nucleophilic attack on carbon atom by the dissociated hydrogen atom on surface Co active sites. The W-promoter exhibited a stronger promoting effect than the Cr-promoter since the W4+ oxide was more active than Cr3+ oxide, However, too large a concentration of either Cr- or W-promoters led to decrease in the activity of Co-B amorphous alloy, since too many Co active sites were covered by Cr3+ or W4+ oxides. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available