4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Socioeconomic status and health at midlife: A comparison of educational attainment with occupation based indicators

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 75-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00079-X

Keywords

socioeconomic factors; occupations; occupational groups; education; health status; symptoms; general pathology

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-00129, R01 AG009775, AG-9775, T32 AG000129] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-5876] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: Educational attainment is a widely used indicator of socioeconomic status (SES) in health studies. However, little is known about its relationship to health relative to measures of occupational standing. This study directly compared education with an array of occupational measures-including social class-in relation to health. METHODS: The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study collected self-reported health data from a sample of 6875 Wisconsin high school graduates aged 53-54 in 1992-1993. The analysis regressed overall health, physical symptoms, and medical conditions on socioeconomic indicators, using logistic regression. RESULTS: Associations of health outcomes with occupational standing net of educational attainment are mainly weak or non existent. Occupational education is the only indicator to have a strong association with health net of education in analyses of both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: While occupation is sometimes an important mechanism linking education and health, control for the overall relation between SES and health may not require measures of occupational standing when educational attainment is measured well. However, the present findings are limited to non-Hispanic white high school graduates from Wisconsin at ages 53-54. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11:75-84. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available