4.5 Article

Signaling pathways of cell proliferation are involved in the differential effect of erythropoietin and its carbamylated derivative

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR CELL RESEARCH
Volume 1833, Issue 8, Pages 1960-1968

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.006

Keywords

Erythropoietin; Carbamylated erythropoietin; FOXO3a; p27(kip1); Cell proliferation; Cell cycle

Funding

  1. University of Buenos Aires (UBA)
  2. National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET)
  3. National Agency for Scientific and Technologic Promotion (ANPCYT)
  4. CONICET (Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is now recognized that in addition to its activity upon erythroid progenitor cells, erythropoietin (Epo) is capable of stimulating survival of different non-erythroid cells. Since stimulation of erythropoiesis is unwanted for neuroprotection, Epo-like compounds with a more selective action are under investigation. Although the carbamylated derivative of erythropoietin (cEpo) has demonstrated non-hematopoietic tissue protection without erythropoietic effect, little is known about differential mechanisms between Epo and cEpo. Therefore, we investigated signaling pathways which play a key role in Epo-induced proliferation. Here. we show that cEpo blocked FOXO3a phosphorylation, allowing expression of downstream target p27(kip1) in UT-7 and TF-1 cells capable of erythroid differentiation. This is consistent with the involvement of cEpo in slowing down G1-to-S-phase progression compared with the effect of Epo upon cell cycle. In contrast, similar antiapoptotic actions of cEpo and Epo were observed in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells. Inhibition and competition assays suggest that Epo may act through both, the homodimeric (EpoR/EpoR) and the heterodimeric (EpoR/beta cR) receptors in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells and probably in the TF-1 cell type as well. Results also indicate that cEpo needs both the EpoR and beta cR subunits to prevent apoptosis of neuronal cells. Based on evidence suggesting that cell proliferation pathways were involved in the differential effect of Epo and cEpo, we went forward to studying downstream signals. Here we provide the first evidence that unlike Epo, cEpo failed to induce FOXO3a inactivation and subsequent p27(kip1) downregulation, which is clearly shown in the incapacity of cEpo to induce erythroid cell growth. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available