4.5 Article

Ammonia and ethylene biomarkers in the respiration of the people with schizophrenia using photoacoustic spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.057006

Keywords

photoacoustic spectroscopy; breath test; ammonia; ethylene; biomarkers; schizophrenia

Funding

  1. Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development of the Ministry of European Funds [POSDRU/159/1.5/S/132395]
  2. CNCS-UEFISCDI
  3. [LAPLAS3/PN09 39]
  4. [PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-0608 (72/2014)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress has become an exciting area of schizophrenia (SCZ) research, and provides ample opportunities and hope for a better understanding of its pathophysiology, which may lead to new treatment strategies. The first objective of the present study was to analyze the oxidative stress markers in breath samples of patients with SCZ before and after the treatment with Levomepromazine. The second objective was to analyze the deficiency of amino acids marker in breath samples of patients with SCZ before and after the treatment. Exhaled breath was collected from 15 SCZ patients and 19 healthy controls; subsequently, CO2 laser photoacoustic spectroscopy was used to assess the exhaled breath compounds of the study subjects. One of the main breath biomarkers of the oxidative stress is ethylene, while one of the main breath biomarkers of the amino acids deficiency is ammonia. The breath biomarkers in the exhalation of SCZ patients exhibited significant differences from the breath biomarkers in the exhalation of healthy controls. Analysis of breath ethylene and breath ammonia provides a related model of SCZ exhalation that could represent an effective and convenient screening method for this intellectual disability. (C) 2015 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available