3.8 Article

Aspects of the transmission of protection against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from sow to offspring

Publisher

BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFTS-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2001.00421.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this study were to describe the variation in concentration of antibodies to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in the serum and colostrum of seas, and to compare the amount of antibodies in colostrum with that obtained in the serum of the smallest piglets in a litter. In addition, the efficacy of the passive immunity in natural conditions was studied. The study was performed in a sow pool herd (600 sows) that was endemically infected with M. hyopneumoniae. Blood samples were collected from sows 19 days (n = 25) before and 3 days (n = 15) after farrowing, and a colostrum sample (n = 25) was collected on the day of farrowing. All samples were analysed for antibodies to M. hyopneumoniae with a monoclonal blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Twelve sows (48%) were high-responders with respect to antibody concentration in colostrum. The amount of blocking decreased in serum during the last weeks of pregnancy and 3 days post-farrowing it was only 53% of the level found in colostrum. At the age of 14 days, 30 of the smallest piglets were weaned. They were divided into three experimental groups, being the offspring of high-responding sows, low-responding sows, or a mix of high- and low-responding sows. The groups were transported to three separated isolation units and were followed until slaughter. At slaughter, lung lesions were not found. Nor could M. hyopneumoniae be demonstrated either by cultivation or by polymerase chain reaction. However, a significant increase in absorbance values, assessed by an indirect-ELISA, was demonstrated in groups established from low-responding sows. It was concluded that a high antibody level in colostrum appeared to protect piglets from M. hyopneumoniae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available