4.5 Article

Identification of a nuclear carbonic anhydrase in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.12.014

Keywords

Caenorhabditis elegans; Carbonic anhydrase; Nuclear targeting; pH regulation; Neurobiology

Funding

  1. USPHS [R01 NS064945]
  2. UNCF/Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Carbonic anhydrases (CA) catalyze the inter-conversion of CO2 with HCO3 and H+, and are involved in a wide variety of physiologic processes such as anion transport, pH regulation, and water balance. In mammals there are sixteen members of the classical alpha-type CA family, while the simple genetic model organism Caenorhabditis elegans codes for six alpha CA isoforms (cah-1 through cah-6). Methods: Fluorescent reporter constructs were used to analyze gene promoter usage, splice variation, and protein localization in transgenic worms. Catalytic activity of recombinant CA proteins was assessed using Hansson's histochemistry. CA's ability to regulate pH as a function of CO2 and HCO3 was measured using dynamic fluorescent imaging of genetically-targeted biosensors. Results: Each of the six CA genes was found to be expressed in a distinct repertoire of cell types. Surprisingly, worms also expressed a catalytically-active CA splice variant, cah-4a, in which an alternative first exon targeted the protein to the nucleus. Cah-4a expression was restricted mainly to the nervous system, where it was found in nearly all neurons, and recombinant CAH-4A protein could regulate pH in the nucleus. Conclusions: In addition to establishing C. elegans as a platform for studying alpha CA function, this is the first example of a nuclear-targeted alpha CA in any organism to date. General significance: A classical alpha CA isoform is targeted exclusively to the nucleus where its activity may impact nuclear physiologic and pathophysiologic responses. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available