4.5 Article

Peripheral arterial vascular function at altitude: sea-level natives versus Himalayan high-altitude natives

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 213-222

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200102000-00007

Keywords

arteries; blood flow; hypoxia; vasodilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Regulation of the vascular system may limit physical performance and contribute to adaptation to high altitude. We evaluated vascular function in 10 Himalayan high-altitude natives and 10 recently acclimatized sea-level natives at an altitude of 5050 m. Methods We registered electrocardiogram, blood flow velocity in the common femoral artery, and blood pressure in the radial artery using non-invasive methods under baseline conditions, and during maximal vasodilation after 2 min leg occlusion, Vascular mechanics were characterized by estimating pulse wave Velocity and input impedance. Results Pulse wave velocity and parameters of input impedance did not differ between groups under baseline conditions. In the post-ischemic period, the ratio between maximal hyperemic and baseline blood flow velocity was significantly higher in the high-altitude than in the sea-level natives (5.7 +/- 2.5 versus 3.8 +/- 1.2, P < 0.05). The leg vascular resistance decreased in the post-occlusive period without differences between groups. Characteristic impedance decreased in the post-ischemic period by about one third of the baseline level without differences between groups. The post-ischemic decrease of input impedance modulus was more marked in the high-attitude than in the sea-level natives at low frequencies (28 +/- 12 versus 6.4 +/- 20% at 2 Hz, P < 0.01). Conclusions Our results demonstrate a superior ability to increase blood flow velocity as a response to muscular ischemia in high-altitude natives compared to sea-level natives. This phenomenon may be associated with a more effective coupling between blood pressure and blood flow which is probably caused by differences in conduit vessel function. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available