4.5 Article

Measurements of fundamental properties of homogeneous tissue phantoms

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.045004

Keywords

tissue-mimicking phantoms; optical phantoms; optical properties; skin; spectrophotometry; scattering

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Center [2011/03/D/ST7/03540]
  2. FNP project [48/UD/SKILLS/2014]
  3. DS Programs of the Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology
  4. FiDiPro project of TEKES [40111/11]
  5. COST Action [BM1205]
  6. Government of the Russian Federation [14.Z50.31.0004]
  7. Russian Presidential [NSh-703.2014.2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the optical measurement techniques used in human skin phantom studies. Their accuracy and the sources of errors in microscopic parameters' estimation of the produced phantoms are described. We have produced optical phantoms for the purpose of simulating human skin tissue at the wavelength of 930 nm. Optical coherence tomography was used to measure the thickness and surface roughness and to detect the internal inhomogeneities. A more detailed study of phantom surface roughness was carried out with the optical profilometer. Reflectance, transmittance, and collimated transmittance of phantoms were measured using an integrating-sphere spectrometer setup. The scattering and absorption coefficients were calculated with the inverse adding-doubling method. The reduced scattering coefficient at 930 nm was found to be 1.57 +/- 0.14 mm(-1) and the absorption was 0.22 +/- 0.03 mm(-1). The retrieved optical properties of phantoms are in agreement with the data found in the literature for real human tissues. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available