3.8 Article

Polymorphisms in the human paraoxonase (PON1) promoter

Journal

PHARMACOGENETICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 77-84

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200102000-00009

Keywords

PON1; promoter polymorphism; atherosclerosis; gene expression; organophosphorus insecticides

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [1 P01 ES09601, ES09883, P30 ES07033] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paraoxonase (PON1) is a protein component of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles that protects against oxidative damage to both low-density lipoprotein and HDL and detoxifies organophosphorus pesticides and nerve agents. A wide range of expression levels of PON1 among individuals has been observed. We examined the promoter region of PON1 for genetic factors that might affect PON1 activity levels. We conducted a deletion analysis of the PON1 promoter region in transient transfection assays and found that cell-type specific promoter elements for liver and kidney are present in the first 200 bp upstream of the coding sequence. Sequence analysis of DNA from a BAC clone and a YAC clone identified five polymorphisms in the first 1000 bases upstream of the coding region at positions -108, -126, -162, -832 and -909. Additionally, the promoter sequences of two individuals expressing high levels of PON1 and two individuals expressing low levels of PON1 were analysed, The two polymorphisms at -126 and -832 had no apparent effect on expression level in the reporter gene assay. The polymorphisms at position -909, -162 (a potential NF-1 transcription factor binding site) and -108 (a potential SP1 binding site) each have approximately a two-fold effect on expression level. The expression level effects of the three polymorphisms appear not to be strictly additive and may depend on context effects. Pharmacogenetics 11:77-84 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available