4.4 Article

Analysis of a 2,4,6-trichlorophenol-dehalogenating enrichment culture and isolation of the dehalogenating member Desulfitobacterium frappieri strain TCP-A

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 2, Pages 133-142

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002030000248

Keywords

Desulfitobacterium frappieri; Clostridium hydroxybenzoicum; Clostridium celerecrescens; reductive dechlorination; 2,4,6-trichlorophenol

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An anaerobic, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol ortho-dehalogenating mixed culture was enriched from sediment of the river Saale (Germany). Two isolated dechlorinating colonies (MK1 and MK2) consisted of rods of different lengths and thicknesses, indicating heterogeneity. Following subcultivation with thiosulfate as alternative electron acceptor and cocultivation with Clostridium celerecrescens(T), the 2,4,6-trichlorophenol-dehalogenating bacterium Desulfitobacterium frappieri strain TCP-A was isolated and characterized regarding its taxonomic properties and the spectrum of chlorophenols that it dehalogenated. Four other bacterial strains were coenriched and identified as organisms with closest phylogenetic relatedness to the Clostridium type strains C. indolis, C. glycolicum, C. hydroxybenzoicum and C. sporosphaeroides (16S rDNA sequence identities of 99.5, 99.2, 94.4, and 93.5%, respectively). Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis of the original dehalogenating cultures MK1 and MK2 (when not exposed to thiosulfate) confirmed the microbial heterogeneity and revealed the presence of two additional species related to the type strains of C. celerecrescens and Clostridium propionicum. Only one copy of the 16S rRNA genes of Desulfitobacterium frappieri in each of the clone libraries of MK1 and MK2 (containing 136 and 56 clones, respectively) was found by dot-blot hybridization, suggesting a relatively low number of the dehalogenating bacterium within the enrichment culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available