4.4 Article

TIN-ag-RP, a novel catalytically inactive cathepsin B-related protein with EGF domains, is predominantly expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 1350-1357

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi002266o

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A human cDNA of 2166 bp encoding a novel cathepsin B-related protein was isolated and characterized. The amino acid sequence of the predicted protein of 467 aa was 46% identical with that of human tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen (TIN-ag), and therefore, the protein was tentatively designated as the TIN-ag-related protein (TIN-ag-RP). The amino acid sequence of TIN-ag-RP is composed of a 21 aa long signal sequence, a 181 aa long N-terminal domain containing two epidermal growth factor-like domains, a follistatin motif, and a 265 aa long cathepsin B-like domain. Interestingly, a serine residue has replaced the active site cysteine residue in the cathepsin B-like domain, resulting in a proteolytically inactive protein. Evolutionary analysis revealed that a distinct family of TIN-ag-like proteins had evolved in vertebrates. Northern blot analysis revealed a single TIN-ag-RP transcript of 2.4 kb in various tissues with the highest transcript levels detected in aorta, heart, placenta, skeletal muscle, kidney, and a colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. Using a polyclonal anti-TIN-ag-RP antibody, TIN-ag-RP expression was predominantly seen in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells, but also in cardiac and skeletal muscle cells as well as in kidney. Interestingly, uterine smooth muscle cells completely lacked TIN-ag-RP expression, implying a regulated gene expression. Localization studies in HeLa cells stably transfected with TIN-ag-RP cDNA showed that TIN-ag-RP is glycosylated and actively secreted, a finding in line with its proposed function as a structural or regulatory protein similar to TIN-ag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available