4.7 Article

Mrp-8 and-14 mediate CNS injury in focal cerebral ischemia

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR BASIS OF DISEASE
Volume 1792, Issue 12, Pages 1198-1204

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.10.003

Keywords

S100A8; S100A9; Toll-like receptor; MCAO; Knockout mice

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Tr742-1-1,2, SFB-TR43]
  2. European Union [201024, 202213]
  3. German Ministry for Health and Education
  4. European Commission [QLG3-CT-2000-00934]
  5. VolkswagenStiftung
  6. BMBF (Center for Stroke research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several reports have recently demonstrated a detrimental role of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in cerebral ischemia, while there is little information about the endogenous ligands which activate TLR-signaling. The myeloid related proteins-8 and-14 (Mrp8/S100A8; Mrp14/S100A9) have recently been characterized as endogenous TLR4-agonists, and thus may mediate TLR-activation in cerebral ischemia. Interestingly, not only TLR-mRNAs, but also Mrp8 and Mrp14 mRNA were found to be induced in mouse brain between 3 and 48 h after transient 1 h focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. Mrp-protein was expressed in the ischemic hemisphere, and co-labeled with CD11b-positive cells. To test the hypothesis that Mrp-signaling contributes to the postischemic brain damage, we subjected Mrp14-deficient mice, which also lack Mrp8 protein expression, to focal cerebral ischemia. Mrp14-deficient mice had significantly smaller lesion volumes when compared to wild-type littermates (130 +/- 16 mm(3) vs. 105 +/- 28 mm(3)) at 2 days after transient focal cerebral ischemia (1 h), less brain swelling, and a reduced macrophage/microglia cell count in the ischemic hemisphere. We conclude that upregulation and signaling of Mrp-8 and-14 contribute to neuroinflammation and the progression of ischemic damage. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available