3.8 Article

Column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for identification of heroin metabolites in human urine

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B
Volume 751, Issue 1, Pages 177-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00469-2

Keywords

heroin; column-switching; HPLC-ESI-MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to prove heroin (DAM) use, a simple, rapid and sensitive analytical method has been established by combining semi-microcolumn HPLC, a column switching technique and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Urine samples were directly introduced to the system, and endogenous urinary constituents were removed by using on-line column switching solid-phase extraction with a strong cation-exchange (SCX) cartridge column (2.0 mm I.D. X 10 mm). Heroin and its metabolites enriched on the top of the column were then successfully analyzed with excellent separation by use of a SCX semi-microcolumn (1.5 mm I.D. X 150 mm), accompanied by ESI mass spectral detection. The proposed conditions are as follows: mobile phase, 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.0)-acetonitrile (30:70, v/v) (for main separation) and 30 mM ammonium acetate (for trapping); flow-rates, 120 mul/min (for main separation) and 200 mul/min (for trapping); capillary voltage, +4.5 kV; cone voltage, 50 V. Linear calibration curves were obtained in the selected ion monitoring (SLM) mode using protonated molecular ions (m/z 370 for DAM, m/z 328 for MAM and mit 286 for MOR) over the concentration ranges from 10 to 1000 ng/ml for morphine (MOR) and 1-100 ng/ml for DAM and 6-acetylmorphine (MAM). The detection limits were 0.1-3 ng/ml. Upon applying the scan mode, 2-30 ng/ml were the detection limits. The present HPLC-ESI-MS method was successfully applied to the determination of opiates in users' urine samples. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available