4.6 Article

Expression of chemokine receptors by lung T cells from normal and asthmatic subjects

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 4, Pages 2842-2848

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2842

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI46784, AI47822] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37734] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lung is an important tertiary lymphoid organ with constant trafficking of T cells through the lung in both health and disease. T cell migration is controlled by a combination of adhesion receptors and chemokines expressed on vascular endothelium and in the tissue, often in an organ-specific manner. This leads to selective accumulation of different T cell subsets, a process called lymphocyte homing. There is evidence for a distinct lung-homing pathway, but no specific lung-homing receptors have been described. We analyzed the chemokine receptor profile of lung T cells to determine the extent to which lung T cells shared homing pathways with other organs such as the gut and skin. In addition, we compared expression of receptors in normal and asthmatic individuals to determine whether different pathways were used in health and disease, We observed that lung T cells expressed a profile of chemokine and adhesion receptors distinct from that of gut- and skin-homing T cells although no chemokine receptor specific for the lung was found. In particular, lung T cells expressed CCR5 and CXCR3, but not CeR9 or cutaneous lymphocyte Ag, and only low levels of CCR4 and alpha (4)beta (7). No differences were observed between lung T cells from normal vs asthmatic subjects. This study provides added support far the concept of a lung-homing pathway separate from other mucosal organs such as the gut and suggests that the chemokine pathways that control T cell migration in normal homeostasis and Th2-type inflammatory responses are similar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available