4.7 Review

Impaired collateral vessel development in diabetes: potential cellular mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 554-560

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00228-5

Keywords

collateral circulation; angiogenesis; growth factors; signal transduction; diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of coronary collateral vessels is a compensatory mechanism secondary to repetitive or chronic myocardial ischemia. During the past three decades the functional and prognostic benefit of such collateral vessels has been established, There are large interindividual differences in the number and extent of collateral vessels that may be explained by differences in the anatomic situation or by differences in the individual capacity to develop functional collateral vessels. Diabetes mellitus has recently been identified as one of the first negative predictors of collateral vessel formation. Novel molecular approaches have helped to improve our understanding of the process of collateral vessel formation in recent years. Besides the process of true angiogenesis, i.e. the formation of new capillaries out of preexisting ones, the formation of a collateral circulation is largely based on the growth of preexisting arterioles (collateral vessels or anastomoses) named arteriogenesis. One important feature of arteriogenesis is the infiltration of monocytes into the growing collateral vessel. Our group shows that the ability of monocytes to migrate towards a gradient of VEGF-A is severely impaired in diabetic individuals, and this impaired response seems to be secondary to a signal transduction defect within the monocyte. In this review the pathophysiology of diabetes-related monocyte dysfunction and the potential role of VEGF-A in collateral vessel formation are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available