4.5 Article

Evaluation of CA1 damage using single-voxel 1H-MRS and un-biased stereology:: Can non-invasive measures of N-acetyl-asparate following global ischemia be used as a reliable measure of neuronal damage?

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 892, Issue 1, Pages 166-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03274-1

Keywords

global ischemia; hippocampus; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; N-acetyl-aspartate; neurodegencration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global brain ischemia provoked by transient occlusion of the carotid arteries (2VO) in gerbils results in a severe loss of neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region. We measured the concentration of the neuron specific N-acetyl-aspartate, [NAA], in the gerbil dorsal hippocampus by proton MR spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) in situ, and HPLC, 4 days after global ischemia. The [NAA] was correlated with graded hippocampus damage scoring and stereologically determined neuronal density. A basal hippocampal [NAA] of 8.37+/-0.10 and 9.81+/-0.44 mmol/l were found from HPLC and LH-MRS, respectively. HPLC measurements of [NAA] obtained from hippocampus 4 days after 2VO showed a 20% reduction in the [NAA] following 4 min of ischemia (P<0.001). H-1-MRS measurements on gerbils subjected to 4 or 8 min of ischemia showed a similar 24% decline in the [NAA] (P<0.05). Thus, there was correlation between the HPLC and H-1-MRS determined NAA decline. There was also a significant correlation between H-1-MRS [NAA] and the corresponding reduction in CA1 neuronal density (P<0.004). In summary our findings show that single voxel H-1-MRS can be used as a supplement to histological evaluation of neuronal injury in studies after global brain ischemia. Accordingly, volume selective spectroscopy has a potential for assessment of neuroprotective therapeutic compounds/strategies with respect to neuronal rescue for delayed ischemic brain damage. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available