4.4 Article

Differential expression of laminin and fibronectin and of their related metalloproteinases in human glioma cell lines:: relation to invasion

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 299, Issue 1-2, Pages 140-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01787-0

Keywords

laminin; fibronectin; metalloproteinases; human glioma cultures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, we analyzed the expression of two major components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), laminin and fibronectin and of two related matrix-metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, in three human glioma cell lines (8 MG, 42 Mg and GL-15) in relation with their differential invasive properties. Immunocytochemistry and Western-blots assays indicated the presence of a 200 kDa laminin, similarly expressed in the three cell lines but undetectable in their ECM. In the opposite, a 230 kDa fibronectin, detected in the three cell lines was differently expressed and only observed in the ECM of the less invasive 8 and 42 MG cells. MMP-2 mRNA analyzed by Northern blots and proMMP-2, evaluated by zymography, were found in the three cell lines but were both ten times higher in the most invasive GL-15 cells. In addition, the active form of MMP-2 was only found in the GL-15 cells. In the opposite, the expression of specific tissular inhibitor (TIMP)-2, an endogenous MMP-2 inhibitor, was restricted to the less invasive cells. MM P-9 activity was detected only in the 8 and 42 MG cells and may not be directly involved in invasion. Taken together, these results indicate that a high MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio may be responsible for the absence of extracellular fibronectin, underlining the participation of tumour cells in the proteolytic degradation of the ECM. An unbalanced MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio in the micro-environment of malignant cells may contribute to their invasive properties. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available