4.7 Article

The nature of the bright submillimeter galaxy population:: A radio-preselected sample with I>∼25

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 548, Issue 2, Pages L147-L151

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/319111

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; radio continuum : galaxies; submillimeter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep submillimeter surveys have successfully detected distant, star-forming galaxies, which are enshrouded in vast quantities of dust and emit most of their energy at far-infrared wavelengths. These luminous galaxies are an important constituent of the universal star formation history, and any complete model of galaxy evolution must account for their existence. Although these sources have been tentatively identified with very faint and sometimes very red optical counterparts, their poorly constrained redshift distribution has made their interpretation unclear. In particular, it was not understood if these galaxies had been missed in previous surveys or if they constituted a truly new class of objects, undetectable at other wavelengths. By utilizing a radio selection technique, we have isolated a sample of 20 submillimeter objects representative of the 850 mum population brighter than 5 mJy with. We show that these galaxies are so heavily dust-obscured that they remain essentially invisible z less than or similar to 3 to ultraviolet selection. Furthermore, relying on the radio/submillimeter flux density ratio, we estimate their redshift distribution, finding a median of two. These results are inconsistent with the existence of a very high redshift (z > 4) population of primeval galaxies (L-bol > 10(12) L-.) contributing substantially to the submillimeter counts. While not a substitute for the thorough follow- up of blank-field submillimeter surveys, our results do shed light on a substantial portion of the luminous submillimeter population with. z less than or similar to 3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available