4.7 Article

In vitro based index of topical anti-inflammatory activity to compare a series of NSAIDs

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00149-1

Keywords

topical NSAID; cyclooxygenase; indomethacin; diclofenac; ketoprofen; piroxicam; tenoxicam; ketorolac

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present work was to generate an index to predict topical efficiency of a series of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): indomethacin, diclofenac, ketoprofen, piroxicam, tenoxicam and ketorolac. This index took into account both biopharmaceutic and pharmacodynamic aspects. The biopharmaceutic aspect, based on the maximal flux (J(m)) was determined experimentally from transdermal studies carried out with human skin in previous work. The pharmacodynamic aspect, based on the ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in vitro, was determined by incubating human dermal fibroblasts in culture, pre-treated with phobol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) for 6 h, with 25 muM [C-14]-arachidonic acid (AA) in the presence of several drug concentrations. The most potent inhibitor of COX-2 activity in induced fibroblasts was diclofenac while indomethacin, ketoprofen and ketorolac were approximately equipotent. Piroxicam and tenoxicam were inhibitors at higher concentrations. Based on the proposed index of the topical anti-inflammatory activity (ITAA) diclofenac, ketorolac, ketoprofen and indomethacin exhibited acceptable efficiency for external use. However, piroxicam and tenoxicam showed the lowest topical anti-inflammatory activity of the series assayed. In conclusion, indomethacin ketorolac, ketoprofen and diclofenac have shown good intrinsic feasibility for formulation into topical pharmaceutical forms. However, for dermatological formulations of oxicams, use of penetration enhancers may be unavoidable. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available