4.6 Article

Spectroscopy of ultra-steep-spectrum radio sources

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 1241-1265

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/319392

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : distances and redshifts; pulsars : general; radio continuum; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present optical spectroscopy of 62 objects selected from several samples of ultra-steep-spectrum radio sources. Forty-six of these are from our primary catalog, consisting of 669 sources with radio spectral indices alpha < -1.30 (S() infinity nu (alpha)); this first spectroscopic subsample was selected on the basis of their faint optical and near-IR identifications. Most are identified as narrow-lined radio galaxies with redshifts ranging from z = 0.25 to z = 5.19. Ten objects are at z >3, nearly doubling the number of such sources known to date. Four of the USS radio sources are identified with quasars, of which at least three have very red spectral energy distributions. The source TN J0936-2242 is identified with an extremely red object (ERO, R-K > 5); both it and a close companion are at z = 1.479. The spectrum of the ERO closely resembles that of previously discovered radio galaxies at z similar to 1.5. Five sources show continuum emission, but fail to show any clear emission or absorption features, despite integrations of similar to1 hr with the Keck telescope. We suggest that these objects could be (1) radio galaxies with faint emission lines in the redshift desert at 1.5 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 2.3, (2) radio galaxies with an obscured active galactic nucleus, which are dominated by a stellar continuum observed with an insufficient signal-to-noise ratio, or (3) pulsars. Three radio sources identified with faint objects in the K-band images remain undetected in 50-90 minute spectroscopic integrations with the Keck telescope, and are possible z > 7 candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available