4.3 Article

Augmentation of a ruptured posterior cruciate ligament provides normal knee joint stability during ligament healing

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 222-228

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00086-3

Keywords

posterior cruciate ligament; augmentation; posterior knee joint stability; polydioxanone; rupture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To identify an augmentation technique which would provide mechanical protection for the healing posterior cruciate ligament. Design. Six human knee specimens were tested in vitro for posterior knee joint stability after augmenting the cut posterior cruciate ligament by six different techniques using a resorbable double strand Polydioxanone augmentation device. Background. A fresh isolated rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament is often treated conservatively. Results have shown that it can heal, but ligament elongations occur frequently. Therefore a method is needed to provide posterior knee joint stability during ligament healing. Methods. The effect of different femoral augmentation insertions on posterior knee stability was tested by recording the anteroposterior (AP) position of the tibia and the augmentation force. Testing was performed during flexion-extension cycles and under posterior shear loads. Results. The insertion combination that proved to stabilize the joints best consisted of one augmentation strand leading along the antero-lateral posterior cruciate ligament fibres and inserting at the distal end of the Blumensaat line and one strand leading along the posteriormedial fibres and inserting in the middle of the Blumensaat line. AP translations similar to those occurring in healthy knee joints could be achieved. Conclusions. It is possible to restore normal posterior knee joint stability by implanting a double strand augmentation device. This can help a posterior cruciate ligament to heal under non-elongated conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available