4.5 Article

Time dependent changes in aortic tissue during cold storage in physiological solution

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1810, Issue 5, Pages 555-560

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.02.003

Keywords

Permeability rate; Hypothermal preservation; Cold tissue storage; Porcine aorta; Pore size

Funding

  1. Institute of Biomedical Imaging Sciences [IBIS-97708]
  2. NIH/NHLBI [T32-HL07812]
  3. CRDF [RUB1-2932-SR-08]
  4. NSF [CMMI-0900743]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Stored vascular tissues are employed in biomedical research for studies in imaging, in biomechanics, and/or in assessing vessel diseases. In the present study, the stability of aortic tissue in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) at 4 degrees C was monitored over a course of 10 days as determined by the rate of glucose permeation measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and validated by histology. Methods and results: The initial mean permeability through fresh porcine aorta was (2.32 +/- 0.46) x 10(-5) cm/s (n = 5); after maintaining the tissue at 4 degrees C for 10 days, the mean rate was (7.37 +/- 0.41) x 10(-5) cm/s (n = 4), an increase of nearly 300%. A z-test verified that a significant change in the permeability rate (p < 0.05) had occurred after 4 days of 4 degrees C storage. Histology was used to quantify changes in tissue pore area. The increase in average pore area paralleled the increase in permeability rate over 10 days. Conclusions: These results suggest that (1) the structural integrity of aortic tissue at 4 degrees C is retained for at least the first three days after resection and (2) OCT is a powerful technology well suited for evaluating tissue structural integrity over time. General significance: Functional OCT imaging provides for a noninvasive and quantitative technique in determining the structural integrity of aortic tissue stored at 4 degrees C. This modality may be used for assessing the efficacy of other preservation techniques. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available