4.5 Review

Isoprostanes and asthma

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1810, Issue 11, Pages 1091-1095

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.04.016

Keywords

Isoprostane; Cyclopentenone; Oxidative stress; Asthma; Airway smooth muscle

Funding

  1. [HL082504]
  2. [ES016836]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isoprostanes are prostaglandin (PG)-like compounds generated in vivo following oxidative stress by nonenzymatic peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, including arachidonic acid. They are named based on their prostane ring structure and by the localization of hydroxyl groups on the carbon side chain; these structural differences result in a broad array of isoprostane molecules with varying biological properties. Generation of specific isoprostanes is also regulated by host cell redox conditions; reducing conditions favor F-2-isoprostane production while under conditions with deficient antioxidant capacity, D-2- and E-2-isoprostanes are formed. F-2-isoprostanes (F-2-isoP) are considered reliable markers of oxidative stress in pulmonary diseases including asthma. Importantly, F-2-isoP and other isoprostanes function as ligands for PG receptors, and potentially other receptors that have not yet been identified. They have been reported to have important biological properties in many organs. In the lung, isoprostanes regulate cellular processes affecting airway smooth muscle tone, neural secretion, epithelial ion flux, endothelial cell adhesion and permeability, and macrophage adhesion and function. In this review, we will summarize the evidence that F-2-isoP functions as a marker of oxidative stress in asthma, and that F-2-isoP and other isoprostanes exert biological effects that contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Biochemistry of Asthma. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available