4.7 Article

Leaf area is stimulated in Populus by free air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE), through increased cell expansion and production

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 305-315

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00684.x

Keywords

Populus; FACE; leaf area; leaf anatomy and biophysics; xyloglucan endotransglycosylase

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on leaf growth in Populus, was studied. For the first time in field conditions, both the production and expansion of leaf cells were shown to be sensitive to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Leaf area expansion rate and final leaf size were stimulated under FACE for three species (Populus x euramericana (I-214), P. nigra (Jean Pourtet) and P. alba (2AS-11), with the largest effect observed for P. x euramericana (61%). In this species and in P. nigra, both epidermal cell size and cell number were increased, whereas for P. alba, only cell production was increased in FACE. Two findings suggest that changes in the cell wall may be important in explaining larger leaf cells in FACE: (i) Leaf cell wall extensibility of rapidly growing leaves increased in all species in FACE; and (ii) an increase in xyloglucan endotransglycosylase activity, a cell wall-loosening enzyme, was increased in FACE and associated with leaf growth rate. The results suggest that the mechanisms by which FACE promotes leaf growth differ, depending on species. Despite this, increases in final leaf size provide an important component driving increased biomass accumulation in POPFACE, during this first year of rapid growth, prior to canopy closure. The question as to whether these effects are the result of a direct response to CO2, or are driven indirectly through substrate availability remains unresolved, although evidence from the literature suggests that the latter mechanism is most likely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available