4.5 Article

Selective cytotoxicity of intense nanosecond-duration electric pulses in mammalian cells

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1800, Issue 11, Pages 1210-1219

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.07.008

Keywords

Nanosecond pulses; Electroporation; Cell death; Dose effect; Pulsed electric field; Nanoelectroporation; Nanopores; Membrane permeabilization

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CAl25482]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM088303]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  4. HQAF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nanosecond electric pulses (EP) disrupt cell membrane and organelles and cause cell death in a manner different from the conventional irreversible electroporation. We explored the cytotoxic effect of Ions EP (quantitation, mechanisms, efficiency, and specificity) in comparison with 300-ns, 1.8- and 9-mu s EP. Methods: Effects in Jurkat and 0937 cells were characterized by survival assays. DNA electrophoresis and flow cytometry. Results: 10-ns EP caused apoptotic or necrotic death within 2-20 h. Survival (S, %) followed the absorbed dose (D, J/g) as: S=alpha D(-K), where coefficients K and a determined the slope and the shoulder of the survival curve. K was similar in all groups, whereas a was cell type- and pulse duration-dependent. Long pulses caused immediate propidium uptake and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, whereas 10-ns pulses caused PS externalization only. Conclusions: 1.8- and 9-mu s EP cause cell death efficiently and indiscriminately (LD50 1-3 J/g in both cell lines); 10-ns EP are less efficient, but very selective (LD50 50-80 J/g for Jurkat and 400-500 J/g for U937); 300-ns EP show intermediate effects. Shorter EP open propidium-impermeable, small membrane pores (nanopores), triggering different cell death mechanisms. General significance: Nanosecond EP can selectively target certain cells in medical applications like tumor ablation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available