4.3 Article

Neutron-induced adaptive response studied in go human lymphocytes using the comet assay

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 91-101

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1269/jrr.42.91

Keywords

adaptive response; comet assay; DNA damage; neutron; atomic bomb survivors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that cells adapted to ionizing radiation developed reduced initial DNA damage when compared to non-adapted cells. The results were obtained by subjecting in vitro irradiated whole blood from 10 healthy volunteers (including 2 A-bomb survivors carrying 1.5-2 Gy in vivo exposure) in an unstimulated condition (G(0)) using the comet assay. The intensity of DNA damage was assessed by computing the 'tail moment'. Adaptive response (AR) was noticed in only donor 3, as indicated by reduced tail moment when the blood samples received priming + challenging doses over a 4 h interval. The priming dose was either 0.01 Gy Cs-137 gamma -rays or 0.0025 Gy Cf-252 neutrons. The delivered challenging dose was either 1 Gy Co-60 g-rays or 0.25 Gy Cf-252 neutrons. The irradiation was conducted using the HIRRAC facility. A prior exposure to 0.0025 Oy Cf-252 neutrons nullified the excess tail moment caused by 0.25 Gy neutrons given during a 4 h gap. In a similar way, 0.01 Gy Cs-137 gamma -rays offered a cross-adaptive response to the neutron challenging dose. The tail moment of A-bomb survivors after in vitro irradiation was less than that of the age-matched control and, at the same time, was not influenced by the priming dose. An altered subset and the immunological status of blood after A-bomb exposure were cited as possible factors. Because AR can affect the outcome of RBE, its individual variability only emphasizes the need to have individual biodosimetry for better risk assessment, especially in planning for a long space voyage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available